By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Hussar

The criticism is directed at the shortcomings of the current legislation, which have resulted in public outcry and enabled the use of negative epithets ("a travesty," "a farce") to describe the presidential elections. There is also indirect criticism aimed at those who persistently try to initiate constitutional amendments for direct presidential elections, given that this is not a realistic solution within the current timeframe.

Insufficient data.

No direct confrontation is voiced, but the speaker questions the presiding officer's right to potentially excessive intervention in the minister's reply. The criticism is institutional and procedural, not politically substantive.