By Plenary Sessions: Martin Helme

The main targets of criticism are the composition of the Riigikogu, which refuses to change the system, and the Supreme Court, which has essentially upheld the laws. The criticism is aimed at the institutions' inaction and procedural deficiencies that impede proper oversight. The attacks are intense and focus on the system's lack of legitimacy.

The primary targets of criticism are the Prosecutor’s Office and the Prosecutor General, who stand accused of violating the law, engaging in illegal surveillance activities, and failing to implement disciplinary mechanisms. The criticism is intense and focuses on both procedural and ethical violations, highlighting examples such as the alleged wiretapping of the Minister of Justice. Opposition is also directed at the Ministry of Justice for its inability to exercise proper oversight.

The confrontation is primarily aimed at the government led by the Reform Party, which is accused of poor management of state finances and making life harder for poorer people. The criticism is intense and focuses on political choices (the green transition, income tax reform) that favor the rich. The government is being called "tax hikers" and "neo-Marxists" who have "screwed up" the country's affairs.

The primary adversary is the head of government, who faces sharp criticism for dishonesty and incompetence in handling international security matters. The criticism is both political and personal, specifically accusing the government of dragging Estonia into a war with Russia. Compromise is out of the question, as they demand a clear and categorical exclusion regarding the deployment of soldiers.

The text is extremely critical of the government (referred to as the "Reform regime") and the heads of security institutions appointed by it. It accuses opponents of employing anti-democratic arguments and of seeking excuses in the context of the "Eastern transport scandal." The attacks are intense, directed both at political decisions and the motives of opponents (e.g., "crocodile tears").

The opposition is aimed directly at the government and Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who is accused of incompetence, cultivating a culture of lying, and pursuing policies hostile to fundamental values. The criticism is intense and deeply value-driven, accusing the government of being hostile to private property and neglecting the fate of the Estonian people. There is no sign of a willingness to compromise, as the government’s policies are viewed as radical and destructive.

The primary opponents are the proponents of the climate crisis, who are referred to as "hysterics" and "experts," and who are accused of implementing a wealth redistribution scheme. Specific political criticism is directed at Kristen Michal. Compromise is ruled out, as the speaker rejects any societal agreement to raise consumer prices.

The main opponent is the Reform Party and the government, who are accused of destroying the economy, corruption (funneling billions to interest groups), and cynical political-technological signaling. The criticism is intense and ranges from the substance of policy (energy) to personal accusations (Kaja Kallas as a lobbyist). Compromise with the government is ruled out, especially concerning the half-baked solution regarding the restriction of voting rights.

The main criticism is aimed at the government's energy policy, specifically regarding the closure of the Narva boilers and the reduction of generating capacity. The criticism is policy-driven, stressing that the government's actions will lead to more expensive energy and higher overall costs. Furthermore, the speaker calls into question the widely accepted concept of the climate crisis.

The main opponent is the Reform Party and Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, who are accused of tanking the economy and pursuing communist policies. The criticism is intense, ideological, and policy-driven, accusing opponents of hating private property and wealth. The speaker promises the repeal of the car tax, the Cohabitation Act, and the perversion of marriage, ruling out any compromise on these issues.