By Plenary Sessions: Martin Helme

Insufficient data.

Data is scarce.

In the current context, the style is confrontational, but the speaker is offering the government a "helping hand" with his proposal to improve the situation. Previously, successful cooperation with market participants (producers, distributors) was emphasized in order to realize the impact of tax cuts. There is no reference to current cross-party cooperation.

Not enough data

No data available

No data available.

Cooperation is lacking, especially concerning climate policy, where any societal agreement to raise consumer prices is rejected. The speaker positions themselves as the only "sane person in the madhouse," which points to strong isolation and confrontation.

The speaker shows no willingness to cooperate with the ruling parties, deeming their policies criminal. He criticizes the Reform Party’s “arrogance” in needing EKRE’s votes to restrict suffrage, stressing that meaningful cooperation necessitates an agreement on a comprehensive citizen-based solution.

Communication with Chairman Jüri Kesküla is direct and procedural, including both agreement ("Correct, Jüri") and requests not to interrupt. He shows a readiness for substantive discussion, referencing the multifaceted debate that took place in the committee. The focus of the session is more on demanding answers than on seeking compromises.

The data is insufficient. The statements are purely oppositional and critical of the government; there is no mention of a willingness to cooperate or seeking compromises.