By Plenary Sessions: Mart Helme

The political position is strongly opposed to totalitarian ideology and irrational legislative proposals, citing sustainability reports and the bill concerning underrepresented genders as examples. The speaker promotes a radical, value-driven step: launching a campaign and drafting legislation for Estonia's exit from the European Union, which is increasingly turning totalitarian. These positions are strongly framed by ideology and values (reason vs. totalitarianism).

The political focus centers on Estonia's security and preventing the provocation of conflict with Russia, an issue that is framed as government incompetence and a violation of international law. The speaker strongly objects to the government's actions during the naval incident, asserting that they violated international maritime law and constituted military escalation. The core position is that security means avoiding conflict, not provoking it.

The political position is strongly anti-government, accusing the current administration of being a corrupt regime and unfit to govern. Key issues include national security (specifically the Gulf of Finland incident and deficiencies in alarm systems) and halting the depopulation of Southern Estonia through real investments. The speaker emphasizes that the government’s actions have damaged the defense will of Estonians (Nursipalu) and that the government’s failure is one based on performance and effectiveness, rather than policy.

The political position is strongly opposed to the draft legislation concerning the support of an aggressor state, arguing that it is too much of an "elastic law" and could lead to absurd consequences (e.g., banning the Catholic Church). The main focus is on defending the principles of the rule of law and the unambiguous interpretation of legislation, standing against the Reform Party's "dictate" and "perverse regime." Although Russia is recognized as an aggressor state, it is emphasized that the law must not be applicable against everyone else.

The political focus centers on strong opposition to the government’s energy policy, which is characterized as "green madness" and is leading the economy toward collapse. There is an emphasis on the urgent necessity for frequency reserves and stable generation capacities, contrasting this approach with the previous "Põxit" rhetoric. The stance is strongly rooted in both values and results, highlighting the need to acknowledge reality.

The political position is strongly opposed to the government's actions, particularly regarding foreign and security policy. The speaker firmly rejects the potential deployment of Estonian military personnel to Ukraine, viewing it as dangerous interference. Furthermore, there is robust opposition to bureaucracy, which is characterized as a "cancer," and to the government's singular focus on Ukraine. They demand a "complete restart" for the sake of Estonia's survival. The political framework is value-based (centered on the protection of Christian holidays) and fundamentally pessimistic regarding security matters.