By Plenary Sessions: Mart Helme

Insufficient data

There are no signs of cooperation; the speech is purely confrontational and demands an answer to the question of why the government wants to maintain Russian influence. The speaker shows no openness to compromise, but instead demands that the opponents cease their activities.

His style of cooperation is highly supportive of his opposition colleagues, particularly concerning the views of the Isamaa faction and finance specialist Aivar Sõerd, for whom he holds deep respect. There is absolutely no readiness to cooperate with the coalition, as their actions are viewed as deliberate abuse of power and a criminal offense, thereby precluding any compromise.

There is no information regarding cooperation. The statements are purely oppositional, demanding that the government change its policies and remove certain plans (e.g., the hate speech law) from the agenda.

The speaker expresses clear support for Varro Vooglaid and the bill he presented, indicating close cooperation with colleagues who share similar values. The style of cooperation is defensive, focused on supporting the bill's proponents against attacks from coalition members. Data concerning cross-party cooperation is absent.

Direct cooperation is not being sought; instead, other opposition parties (Isamaa, EKRE) are being warned about the potential blackmail threatening them from the government. Reference is made to previous successful international cooperation (the Norwegian government's support for the renovation of manor schools), which demonstrates a certain readiness for pragmatic partnership in pursuit of cultural objectives.

No data available

The speaker stresses the necessity for and prior precedent of broad-based inter-agency cooperation, involving representatives of health institutions and the Ministry of Social Affairs. This indicates a preference for engaging multiple sectors in solving complex problems.