By Months: Mart Helme
Total Months: 11
Fully Profiled: 11
12.2024
18 Speeches
The speeches contain no reference whatsoever to cooperation or willingness to compromise with the coalition; instead, he takes the position that a "civilized debate" is impossible. He supports and cites the legal arguments of other opposition members (e.g., Varro Vooglaid), but personally focuses on attacking the opposing side.
11.2024
33 Speeches
The speaker demonstrates strong cooperation and solidarity with fellow opposition colleagues (Martin Helme, Varro Vooglaid, Isamaa), supporting their positions and legislative initiatives (such as the abortion bill and budget criticism). Any cooperation or compromise with the ruling coalition is entirely ruled out. Communication is predominantly accusatory, demanding the government cease its operations.
10.2024
50 Speeches
Cooperation is deemed necessary on a cross-party basis concerning the demographic crisis and the preservation of the nation-state. This requires a "nationwide consensus," much like the issues surrounding national defense. However, doubt is immediately voiced that the ruling coalition will not support this consensus, resulting in a lack of practical cooperation. The coalition's conduct is characterized as creative interpretation and arbitrary regulation.
09.2024
37 Speeches
The style of cooperation is hostile and uncompromising towards the government, focusing on demanding accountability. The unified desire of the entire opposition for the Prime Minister to answer questions is noted, pointing to the coordination of efforts within the opposition ranks. The government is being called upon to engage in dialogue and communication, rather than simply reading out talking points drafted by officials.
07.2024
18 Speeches
There are no references to cooperation with the government; the style is purely confrontational and accusatory. Joint action by the opposition is mentioned, such as the submission of a motion of no confidence against Vladimir Svet, which is considered the duty of the people's representatives. The derogatory language used by coalition members regarding the motion of no confidence is deemed inappropriate and a sign of poor political culture.
06.2024
6 Speeches
The speaker acknowledges the contribution of other opposition parties in presenting their arguments, referring to them as "fellow opposition members." The style of cooperation is primarily aimed at stressing the unity of the opposition in their fight against the government. There is absolutely no mention of a willingness to compromise with the coalition; instead, the focus is on highlighting the government's irresponsibility.
05.2024
19 Speeches
A willingness to cooperate is absent; the speaker accuses the government of ignoring the opposition and demands the government's resignation or the inclusion of new, more competent partners from the opposition. Support is noted for colleague Helmen Kütt's positions on energy issues, but the overall attitude is confrontational and uncompromising.
04.2024
51 Speeches
The style of cooperation is purely confrontational and uncompromising, accusing the coalition of silencing the opposition and employing voluntaristic methods. It is noted that EKRE's substantive legislative proposals (e.g., revoking voting rights) failed to gain support even from Isamaa. The coalition is expected to see a "return to normalcy" before any cooperation becomes possible.
03.2024
66 Speeches
The speaker emphasizes the substantive cooperation between the opposition parties (EKRE and the Center Party) in the submission of interpellations. While the readiness to cooperate with the coalition is low, alternative draft bills are being offered (such as abolishing expense compensations and restricting voting rights). The coalition is simultaneously accused of rejecting these proposals and avoiding meaningful work. The speaker also recognizes the substantive contributions and speeches made by colleagues (e.g., Anastassia, Urmas Reinsalu).
02.2024
52 Speeches
Cooperation is viewed as internal to the opposition, citing the support of colleagues (such as those from the Isamaa faction) and the joint demand by the three opposition parties to withdraw the bill from the agenda. They show no readiness to compromise with the government, instead demanding a change in government policy or the removal of the bills from the agenda. Regarding the topic of national sciences, they stress the need to find a golden mean, involving university representatives, but the overall tone remains confrontational.
01.2024
74 Speeches
The willingness to cooperate with the government is completely absent; instead, they emphasize the opposition’s role in exposing the government’s mistakes. Coalition members are called upon to hold a debate, but it is noted that they are merely "vegetating" and show no interest. [The speaker/party] also mentioned abstaining from the vote on Indrek Saar's candidacy so as not to vote against the Estonian delegation.