By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

When discussing social issues, travel opportunities are highlighted as a key justification for EU membership, and the failure of this promise regarding Rail Baltic is causing disappointment. The security aspect is being considered strictly from a national defense perspective, rather than in the context of civil liberties.

On social issues, the speaker is strongly conservative, sharply opposing the consent law, which is viewed as undermining family cohesion, fostering gender dystopias, and serving as a hypocritical imitation of protecting women. Concern is also voiced regarding immigration, linking immigrants to lawlessness and violence.

Among social issues, emphasis is placed on the economic burden and fairness facing the Estonian people, particularly concerning the increase in land tax and nature conservation restrictions on agricultural and forest land within the context of the green transition. He defends landowners against obligations imposed by the government.

In the social sphere, the speaker strongly defends parental decision-making rights concerning children's health and bodily integrity, taking a stand against mandatory vaccination. He also voices concern regarding plans to legalize euthanasia, citing its growing proportion and the increasing inclusion of psychological grounds among young people in other countries.

The speaker focuses on family policy, population sustainability, and mental health among social issues. He/She is categorically opposed to mandatory military service for women, arguing that it jeopardizes family structures, birth rates, and accelerates the emigration of young professionals from Estonia. The necessity of a family-friendly crisis plan is stressed, one that would ensure the availability of childcare providers in the event of mobilization.

Social issues related to compulsory military service are being addressed, noting the decreasing number of young men available. The question of plans for mandatory military service for women is being raised, expressing an extremely negative and worried attitude toward the idea ("Are we going to kill Estonian women in the war too?").

Insufficient data.

It focuses on social and value issues, taking a strong stand against liberal gender identity ideologies and the registration of names that do not correspond to one's sex/gender. It expresses concern regarding the merging of schools for children with special educational needs and highlights the risk, present in the draft Child Protection Act, of allowing pedophiles to work with children. It also raises the issue of the safety and security of Riigikogu members in connection with the behavior of a colleague in a public place.