By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

The main opponents are the Social Democrats (Sotsid), who are accused of protecting the interests of ‘grey passport holders’ (stateless residents) and acting against the interests of the Estonian state. The Reform Party is criticized for hypocrisy because they demand the removal of voting rights from citizens of the aggressor state but fail to support the draft legislation that would make this possible. The criticism is intense, accusing opponents of destroying the state and posing a security threat.

The main opponent is the Reform Party government and the prime minister, who are being blamed for the economic recession, corruption, and the impoverishment of the nation. The criticism is intense, covering both policy issues (tax hikes, giving away resources) and personal behavior (the prime minister's "delusions" and detachment from reality). There is no sign of willingness to compromise; instead, answers and revelations are being demanded.

The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is criticized both for its political substance (the green transition, social funding) and for its past governance (underfunding of national defense). The criticism is intense and ranges from issues of political substance all the way to demanding a vote of confidence regarding Jürgen Ligi's position on supporting the Reform Party. He also criticizes the Ministry of Climate and its "overpaid activists."

The opposition is aimed at the ideological content of the draft bill and its proponents, who are accused of climate deception and fearmongering. Criticism is also directed at the government's policy, which forces people to travel and taxes their cars. The ideological opponents are linked to the terminology and policies of "red socialists."

The confrontation is directed at "liberals" and specific colleagues (e.g., Tanel Kiik), whose arguments (local clinics, abortion migration, access for the poor) are considered false or irrelevant. The speaker sharply criticizes the state and the government, accusing them of impoverishing families (cutting benefits, car tax) and subsequently financing abortion as an ironic form of "aid."

The main opponent is the government and the coalition, especially the Reform Party, which is accused of deliberately making the lives of Estonian people harder through high taxes and prices. The criticism is intense, ranging from political disagreements to accusations of corruption risk (Rail Baltic) and a personal lack of interest in the welfare of the nation. The opposition is uncompromising, accusing the coalition of prioritizing the "sweetness of power" over the persecution of the people.

The main opponents are the authors of the car tax law and the government (referring to Kaja Kallas), who are criticized both for the law's shortcomings and for unethical behavior. The criticism is intense and includes direct accusations of lying about the tax increases, calling the opponent's claims "very ridiculous."

The confrontation is aimed at the government, the Reform Party, and the Minister of Education and Research. The criticism is intense and political, accusing the government of maintaining a base of disloyal voters and attempting to lie to the Estonian people. A compromise on the issue of voting rights is ruled out, as the government's proposed solution is considered "strange, weak, and actually very dangerous for Estonia."

The main opponents are the government (especially Prime Minister Kaja Kallas) and the ideological leaders of the green transition in Europe. The criticism is directed both at political incompetence (unrealistic goals, poor-quality sources of information) and personal hypocrisy (Kallas's husband's business dealings with Russia). The speaker also criticizes the previous speaker for "antagonizing" Hungary.

The primary opponent is the minister and the government, who are intensely criticized for social policies that undermine the family and the mental health of young people. The criticism is policy-based, but it is presented as morally destructive, directly accusing the government of eroding the sense of security among youth and promoting gender confusion.