By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme
Total Sessions: 5
Fully Profiled: 5
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
The opposition is aimed at a specific Commission proposal, which is being criticized for completely changing its substance. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, as it jeopardizes their original request. The possibility of compromise is not mentioned.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the ruling coalition, especially the Reform Party and the Social Democrats, who are accused of holding similar ideological views regarding the taxation and redistribution of wealth. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of incompetence, covering ideological expenditures, and seizing people's money under the guise of fearmongering. Compromise is ruled out; they demand the immediate termination of the tax process.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is the government, specifically Prime Minister Kaja Kallas (over the secret meeting) and the Foreign Minister (over the insufficient response). The criticism is procedural (lack of transparency, secret meetings) and political (surrendering sovereignty). The speaker vehemently rejects the opposing side's accusations, labeling them absurd and false.
2024-06-04
15th Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the Reform Party and Kaja Kallas, who are being fiercely criticized for their failure to deliver on pre-election pension promises (400 euros, income tax exemption) and for outright lying. The criticism is intense and focuses on political dishonesty. Additionally, government representatives are facing challenges regarding the provision and funding of vital services.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The primary targets are coalition ministers who stand accused of corruption and conflicts of interest, particularly concerning major donors. The criticism is intense and highly personal, focusing on ethical incompetence and the establishment of a "self-serving committee." Compromise is off the table; they are demanding the minister's resignation and that he be placed under investigation.