By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

The political stance is strongly opposed to the Commission's substantive proposal, as it fundamentally alters the originally intended substance. The position is clearly procedural and policy-driven, emphasizing the necessity of preserving the original objective. The speaker demands a vote on the amendment to prevent the distortion of the content.

The political position is strongly opposed to the motor vehicle tax, which is viewed as fundamentally flawed, unconstitutional (with reference to § 56), and contrary to the will of the people, given that 76% of the population does not support it. The idea of taxation is framed as an unjust burden that undermines people's ability to cope financially and contributes to the decline of state functioning. The speaker represents the stance of the Estonian Conservative People's Party, promising to certainly abolish the tax upon gaining power.

The core political position centers heavily on national sovereignty and transparency, standing in opposition to the rising influence of international organizations (the UN, WHO, IMF, and the Bilderberg Group). The speaker contends that Estonia’s security, economic, and healthcare policies are being dictated from abroad, which constitutes a major problem. This is a strongly value-based stance, demanding that the country be governed by politicians who hold a mandate, rather than by unelected organizations.

The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on the government's (Reform Party) breaking of pre-election promises regarding pension increases and income tax exemption, explicitly calling this outright lying. Furthermore, the need to ensure the continuity of vital services is emphasized, especially in the context of the funding deficit for road maintenance (4.4 billion). Concern is also expressed about the potential negative impact of European Union directives on local service providers. The political framework is primarily aimed at criticizing the failures of the government's actions and policies.

The political focus is heavily centered on corruption and conflicts of interest, particularly regarding ministerial decisions tied to the business interests of major companies (e.g., Bolt, Seib) that financed political parties at the European level. The speaker demands the minister's resignation and the launch of an investigation into the violation of anti-corruption legislation. This stance is strongly oppositional, zeroing in on the government's ethical and legal accountability.