By Plenary Sessions: Helle-Moonika Helme

The data is limited to a single intervention during the plenary session, related to the request for a vote. There is insufficient data to assess broader patterns of activity.

The pattern of activity involves procedural hurdles during the Riigikogu plenary session debate on the motor vehicle tax bill. The speaker repeatedly demands votes on amendments and calls 10-minute recesses before the votes, suggesting a tactic of obstruction. The speeches are concentrated on a single day and a single draft law.

The mode of operation is reactive, focusing on questions regarding the government's activities (specifically the Prime Minister's meetings) during the Riigikogu's information hour (Q&A session). The speaker demands repeated investigation and full public accountability to the people of Estonia and the wider public. This pattern involves continuous scrutiny of the government's actions and the persistent demand for transparency.

The speaker was highly active during the June 4th plenary session, delivering sharp political retorts as well as posing several detailed questions concerning essential services and European Union directives. This pattern of engagement shows a clear willingness to intervene in day-to-day political disputes while also delving deeply into legislative details.

The speaker was active during the plenary session on June 3rd, participating in the proceedings concerning the motion of no confidence and posing pointed questions to the minister. He/She also participates in the committee's work, commending a colleague for their objective overview and seeking long-term support from the committee on certain issues.