By Plenary Sessions: Andre Hanimägi

The tone is formal and respectful, whether addressing ministers or colleagues. The style remains largely analytical and procedural, particularly when communicating the specifics of the Legal Committee's deliberations. The preference is for logical arguments and fact-based reporting, rather than emotional appeals.

The style is formal and respectful, addressing both the Deputy Chairman and the Chancellor of Justice, whom he thanks for bringing people's concerns to the forefront. The tone is serious and concerned, highlighting the "ominous" character of the phrase included in the Chancellor of Justice's report ("nine innocents on the gallows rather than one guilty person in a carriage"). He uses a rhetorical question to direct responsibility toward specific institutions.

The rhetorical style is formal, serious, and urgent, emphasizing the complexity and diversity of the threats. It utilizes both logical arguments (structure, salaries, technology) and emotional appeals (referencing credible institutions and the personal attack on the Minister of the Interior). The discourse is comprehensive, encompassing both technological solutions and community involvement.