By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The speaker's political position strongly defends independence and sovereignty, opposing the ceding of decision-making authority to the European Union and international agreements that restrict Estonia's freedom. Another central theme is the protection of citizens' fundamental rights and privacy against the national surveillance system (license plate recognition cameras), which the speaker deems unconstitutional. These stances are value-based, appealing to the timeless independence enshrined in Article 1 of the Estonian Constitution.

The political position is highly critical of the decline in security (specifically, confirming departure from residence via simple email) and the restriction of consumer 'right to repair' rights, viewing the latter as primarily serving the interests of major manufacturers. Criticism is also leveled at the ineffective scheduling and work time planning by the Riigikogu Board. The focus is heavily directed toward improving the substance of policy and the overall organization of parliamentary work.

The political position is strongly anti-government, focusing on public resistance (supporting the teachers' strike) and tax hikes. Strong opposition to the escalation of the war in Ukraine is emphasized, warning of the danger of a Third World War. The political framework is both value-based (freedom, forgetting the legacy of servitude) and results-based (manipulation of ratings). The speaker calls upon the nation to forget its "genes of servitude" and rise up against the government.

The political position is strongly focused on protecting the constitutional order and civil liberties, opposing government bills that are deemed unconstitutional and seen as a blueprint for establishing a totalitarian society. The political framework is guided by core values and the principles of the rule of law, lending strong support to the legal assessment provided by the Office of the President. The speaker emphasizes that decisions must not be made "based on feelings," but rather on the basis of professional expertise.

The political stance is strongly focused on protecting the privacy of sensitive personal data and bank accounts from unauthorized access by state authorities. The speaker demands legal accountability and sanctions for officials who have unlawfully accessed this data, emphasizing strict adherence to the principles of the rule of law. This position is highly critical of the state's actions, which have failed to notify tens of thousands of individuals. The primary focus is directed toward improving government operations and ensuring the state adheres strictly to the law.

The political focus centers on criticizing healthcare and evidence-based policy, particularly concerning the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. The speaker strongly opposes the minister's rigid narrative, stressing that science and medicine are constantly evolving. He/She refers to a previous shift in his/her own stance, noting that in 2023, his/her statements regarding vaccine injuries were acknowledged as true upon the passing of the relevant legislation.

The political stance focuses on monitoring the work organization and procedures of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). The speaker expresses concern or surprise regarding the low attendance at the session, calling into question either the size of the Riigikogu's composition or the legitimacy of the session. The focus is more on the institution's functionality than on specific political values.

The political focus is heavily centered on issues of national defense and internal security, particularly the inadequate capability for drone detection. The speaker sharply criticizes the situation, which they believe allows Russia to arm the "fifth column" operating in Estonia. This stance conveys deep concern and demands explanations from the government, framing the issue as a critique of security deficiencies.

The speaker's position is strongly oppositional and populist, focusing on legally and procedurally challenging the actions of the government and the Riigikogu Board. The main themes include violations of law in Parliament, false statements made by ministers, and the defense of the people's rights (e.g., opposition to the car tax, support for the teachers' strike). The political framework is strongly value-driven, emphasizing the principles of the rule of law and the restoration of parliamentary dignity.