By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The political focus is on the protection of constitutionality and the principles of the rule of law. The speaker is strongly opposed to the draft anti-money laundering law because it violates personal inviolability and turns all citizens into potential subjects of criminal proceedings. The stance is strongly value-based, emphasizing that the Riigikogu has repeatedly committed "serious blunders" in adopting unconstitutional laws.

The political position is vehemently opposed to the legislative bill expanding the powers of the Money Laundering Data Bureau (RAB), which is being viewed as the emergence of a totalitarian society. This stance is strongly value-based, emphasizing constitutional rights, personal integrity, and the sanctity of property against state surveillance. The speaker demands the immediate rejection of the bill to prevent state encroachment upon privacy.

The political stance strongly focuses on protecting families living in sparsely populated areas from service fees imposed by local governments (LGAs) for services they do not actually utilize. The speaker criticizes the system, noting that while LGAs have the right to grant exemptions from these fees, they lack the financial motivation to do so, demanding legal mechanisms to safeguard citizens' rights. The position is firmly aimed at protecting citizens' rights against the financial limitations faced by local governments.

The political position is strongly oppositional to the government, criticizing their economic policy and the quality of their legislative work. The speaker frames the situation in the country as unbearable, even referencing a quote from Lenin and the necessity of revolution. The main issues are opposition to tax increases and the violation of the constitutional order, with the criticism aimed squarely at the government's stupidity or outright malice.

The political stance focuses heavily on adherence to legislative procedures and constitutionality. The speaker opposes the abuse of the Riigikogu's right to self-organization, stressing that established norms must restrict the power of the governing coalition. The position is fundamentally procedural and strongly emphasizes the principles of the rule of law.

The political stance centers on strong opposition to the illegal state surveillance being carried out by the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) using license plate and facial recognition cameras. The speaker emphasizes the principles of the rule of law and views the government's attempts to amend the legislation as evidence of the police's prior unlawful activities. This position is strongly value-driven, warning against the dangers of a surveillance society and demanding accountability. The objective is to halt the use of illegally collected evidence in criminal proceedings.

Political positions are heavily focused on defending Estonia's sovereign right to decide against European Union directives (specifically regarding the changing of the clocks) and prioritizing public health. He/She is firmly opposed to the deployment of anti-personnel mines due to humanitarian considerations, stressing the necessity of preventing civilian casualties. Furthermore, he/she defends the free mandate and immunity of a member of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament), criticizing the muzzling effect of the ERJK (Political Party Financing Surveillance Committee) system. His/Her political framework is strongly value-based, emphasizing independence and the welfare of the people.

The political focus is currently on strengthening the enforcement and compliance of language requirements for platform service providers (taxi drivers). The speaker strongly refutes the minister’s assertion that there is a low number of complaints, emphasizing the seriousness of the issue and the necessity of eliminating violations of language requirements. The political stance is firmly directed towards the enforcement of regulations and adherence to the law.

The most prominent issue is the transparency of Rail Baltic's ownership structure and the actual owners. The speaker is highly skeptical of the information provided, demanding specific and verifiable data (company name, business registry code). This is a results-oriented and political framework that focuses on the accountability of the national project.