By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The speaker is active during the plenary session, intervening in the third reading of the draft bill and repeatedly raising questions regarding options for halting the process. They reference previous events, such as the Chancellor of Justice's three visits to the Riigikogu and laws returned by the President, demonstrating consistent concern over the quality of legislation.

There is not enough data.

The data reveals activity during a single sitting day, characterized by repeated and sustained questioning on one specific topic (the exemption of local government units from taxation and citizens' rights).

The speaker’s pattern of activity is concentrated on the plenary session, where they deliver both longer critical speeches concerning the economy and the constitution, and actively participate in the question-and-answer round. They refer to the Chancellor of Justice’s three recent visits to the Riigikogu and the minutes of the Legal Affairs Committee, which demonstrates active involvement in legislative procedures.

Data is scarce.

The speaker is actively participating in the Riigikogu plenary session as part of an interpellation, posing questions to the Prime Minister and challenging his responses. This indicates active involvement in parliamentary oversight mechanisms. There is no data available regarding the frequency of other activities or appearances.

The speaker is highly active during the plenary session, serving both as the rapporteur for draft legislation and asking and answering questions on various subjects. He/She initiates draft laws and actively participates in debates, also referencing prior discussions held in the committees.

The speaker pointed to previous engagement, including the submission of the draft amendment to the Public Transport Act to the Riigikogu a couple of months ago, participation in committee meetings, and meetings with taxi drivers. This demonstrates ongoing, persistent effort in addressing the matter.

The speaker demonstrates a persistent pattern of behavior, emphasizing that the same question regarding the ownership of Rail Baltic was already posed to Minister Taavi Aas during the previous term of the Riigikogu (Parliament). This indicates a consistent and long-term focus on this specific topic.