By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The political focus is on the risks and inadequate regulation of wind energy (wind turbines), emphasizing threats to both energy security and public health. Strong criticism is leveled against the current system, which fails to guarantee sufficient reserve capacity and conceals health impacts. The discussion is primarily policy- and performance-based, focusing on the system’s inefficiency and costs.

The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the actions of the government (the Reform Party) in the areas of sovereignty, the economy, and social policy. The most acute issues are the selling off of Estonia's resources, tax increases, and the implementation of Brussels' dictates, against which the public is called upon to resist. The political platform is strongly value-based, emphasizing the constitutional order and the role of the people as the ultimate source of power.

The political position is firmly focused on ensuring clarity in lawmaking and guaranteeing equal treatment. The speaker vehemently opposes the use of discretionary authority in the enforcement of the law, arguing that it creates the potential for unequal treatment of individuals and is therefore hazardous. This stance is policy-driven and underscores the principles of the rule of law.

The political position is strongly regulatory, demanding equal requirements for all participants in the taxi services market to ensure consumer protection and fair competition. He/She emphasizes that the current situation, where differing requirements are in force, violates the constitution and the principles of the rule of law. The stance is deeply rooted in policy and values, aiming to protect traditional service standards.

The political position is one of strong opposition, centered on the government's flawed performance and the adoption of unconstitutional legislation. The speaker stresses that the Riigikogu is failing to implement the will of the Estonian people and, consequently, demands the organization of snap elections and the dissolution of parliament. The focus is heavily directed toward the poor performance of the government and the coalition, and the lack of democratic legitimacy.

The political position is one of strong opposition, centered on the constitutionality and procedural correctness of draft legislation. The speaker objects to the motor vehicle tax, deeming it at least partially unconstitutional, and demands clarification regarding the necessity of amending the Income Tax Act. Furthermore, in the context of public health, emphasis is placed on the lack of national-level knowledge concerning the dangers posed by wind turbine infrasound. The overall framework is heavily focused on policy and legal norms.

The political focus is on strong opposition to the car tax, which is being treated as a procedural and legal violation. The speaker encourages citizens to challenge their tax notices in administrative court to halt the implementation of the tax. The stance is strongly policy- and procedure-based, emphasizing the violation of the secondary law, specifically the rules of good legislative practice.