By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The main opponent is the current government, which is accused of violating the constitution and failing to reach an agreement with local municipalities. The criticism is intense, ranging from political opposition to accusations of implementing a Stalinist policy of destruction that is taxing people to death.

The primary opponents are the supporters of the nuclear energy bill, who are accused of ignoring the risks and serving the interests of foreign corporations. Criticism is also aimed at the Riigikogu Board over procedural errors (misreading of voting results) and at the Supreme Court for the improper handling of e-voting complaints. It also calls into question the rapporteur's knowledge regarding the dangers of the issue.

He/She strongly opposes the submitters of the statement and their supporters, criticizing them for interference and escalating the situation. The criticism is intense and includes extremely blunt personal rejection, which completely rules out any compromise.

The primary criticism is aimed at the ruling coalition (the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Estonia 200), which is accused of draining the Estonian people and executing the mandates of globalists. The criticism is both ideological and procedural (specifically, the committee's malpractice in merging amendments), and the speaker explicitly rules out supporting the candidates of the ruling parties in the elections.

The standoff is aimed at Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, criticizing her absence from the parliament's information session. The criticism is procedural and demands an explanation regarding the attendance of the head of government.

Fierce opposition is currently targeting the Reform Party, which faces criticism both for the government's failures (specifically IT systems) and for allegedly violating the principles of the rule of law. The criticism is intense, featuring direct comparisons to authoritarian leaders, and the Reform Party's sincerity regarding the minister retaining their position is also being questioned. Criticism is also directed at the IT minister for the system's failure.