By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The political position is strongly opposed to the Land Tax Act, emphasizing its unconstitutionality (specifically regarding Section 154) and the infringement upon the autonomy of local governments. This stance is framed on a values basis (constitutionality) and is intensely critical of the government's actions, accusing it of ignoring the populace. The overall policy direction is fundamentally opposed to the government's tax policy.

The politician's position is strongly opposed to the introduction of nuclear energy in Estonia, emphasizing the danger posed to Estonian territory and the serving of foreign corporations' interests. He also expresses profound distrust regarding the legality of electronic voting, citing widespread public skepticism and the Supreme Court's refusal to uphold the complaints filed. His standpoints are deeply rooted in values, focusing on protecting the state and the nation from major risks. Furthermore, he criticizes the Riigikogu Board for procedural errors.

The political position is firmly set against interference in the internal affairs of other nations, stressing the absolute nature of sovereignty and a value-based approach. He considers the statement under discussion detrimental, as it only serves to escalate an already tense global situation. The position is highly confrontational and questions the utility of the statement, arguing that, in the speaker's view, it is utterly pointless.

The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's tax policy, especially the car tax, which is framed as part of the implementation of a broader "neo-communism" and globalist agenda. The speaker stresses the need to protect private property and the Estonian people's desire to be masters of their own destiny, calling for massive resistance and the ousting of the government. The framework is strongly value-based and ideological, linking the tax hikes to an international network of influence.

The political stance centers on government accountability and the Prime Minister's presence during the Riigikogu information session (Question Time). A critical and procedural question is being raised regarding the reasons for Prime Minister Kaja Kallas's absence, emphasizing the transparency of the government's activities. The framework of this position is clearly results-based and procedural.

The political focus centers on criticizing the government's actions and failures within its IT systems—for instance, the non-operation of the Land Board's (Maa-amet) new system, which is seen as a major obstacle to providing services to citizens. Robust opposition is aimed at violations of the principles of the rule of law, demanding verification of the legitimacy of parliamentary (Riigikogu) decisions and citing the oath taken to protect the constitution. The criticism is primarily results-oriented and values-driven, accusing the Reform Party of employing tactics akin to authoritarian methods.