By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The primary adversaries are the presiding officer (for disregarding procedural rules) and the cabinet minister (for ignoring health matters, negligence, and deceit). The criticism is intense, directly accusing the minister of dishonesty and disregard for public health. The standoff is both procedural and personal, with a total unwillingness to compromise.

Strong opposition is directed at the minister and government representatives, who are criticized for failing to provide answers, avoiding uncomfortable topics, and searching for a "lifeline." Criticism is also leveled against the science policy that was in effect during COVID-19 and the alleged prohibition of alternative analyses. The criticism is both political and procedural, demanding that the minister be held accountable.

The main opposition is directed at the bill's rapporteur (Mr. Terras) and the bill's proponents, who are criticized for failing to provide a substantive answer and for unparliamentary behavior. The criticism is intense and personal, accusing the rapporteur of wasting time and "playing dumb," and labeling his excuses as "pathetic." He also criticizes the Reform Party's earlier stances regarding visa freedom.

The main opponent is Minister of the Interior Lauri Läänemets, who is being sharply criticized for unconstitutional activity and the "policy of closing churches." The criticism is intense, including both procedural accusations (disregard for the constitution) and personal attacks (comparisons to totalitarian figures).

The primary opponent is the government, particularly Climate Minister Yoko Alender, whose actions are being labeled unlawful and shameless due to her disregard for the law. The criticism is intense and focuses on political negligence and the failure to provide answers. The mainstream media is also being criticized for aligning itself with the government and labeling concerned citizens as "participants in a traveling circus."

The main targets of opposition are the Prime Minister and the Government of the Republic, who face criticism regarding both policy (the detrimental effects of wind farms) and personal conduct (dictatorial tendencies, spreading misinformation). Criticism is also leveled at the chairman of the Riigikogu session for arbitrarily bending procedural rules. The intensity of these attacks is extremely high, demanding the Prime Minister's resignation and ruling out any possibility of negotiations.

The main opposition is directed against Foreign Minister Tsahkna, criticizing his personal conduct and the use of language inappropriate for a diplomat when labeling a member of the Riigikogu (Parliament) with the term ("recidivism"). The criticism is both personal and procedural, focusing on the minister's accountability and the use of improper expressions. The controversy is intense, and the possibility of initiating legal action against the minister is being explored.