By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Grünthal

The speaker is active in plenary sessions, participating both in procedural disputes with the presiding officer and by posing substantive questions to ministers. The pattern demonstrates persistence in demanding specific answers and recalling previous ministerial statements. All contributions originate from a single session day, which suggests intensive participation in the debate.

The speaker is highly active during the plenary session, posing a series of questions concerning both draft legislation and current political topics. This pattern demonstrates a rapid response to the answers provided, including demanding the minister's recall whenever they feel the question has been left unanswered.

The speaker is highly active during the plenary session, participating intensely in the debate concerning the Act on the Amendment of the Constitution. Their pattern of activity involves repeatedly questioning the rapporteur and requesting extra time to present their positions. They mention pressing the button on the Riigikogu apparatus, which demonstrates active involvement in the question round.

The speaker actively participated in the plenary session on February 19th, repeatedly posing questions and raising objections to the Minister of the Interior. This pattern demonstrates a readiness to intervene in heated debates and demand accountability from the minister.

The speaker is active in Riigikogu sessions, submitting questions to get answers regarding wind turbines. He/She engages in direct communication with state institutions, mentioning a one-and-a-half-hour conversation at the Health Board last Wednesday. He/She also participates in public meetings to seek answers until those answers are provided.

The speaker is active in the plenary session, both raising procedural questions and addressing inquiries to the Prime Minister. He/She refers to recent activity outside the chamber, such as visiting the Health Board and monitoring the discussions of the Social Affairs Committee. The pattern demonstrates a rapid response both to parliamentary procedural violations and to the consequences of government policy.

No data available