By Plenary Sessions: Ants Frosch

Total Sessions: 5

Fully Profiled: 5

2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the operational structure and legal processes of security agencies, using specific terminology such as "timeframe," "tin room procedure," and referencing the activities of the Internal Security Service (Kaitsepolitsei) and the Prosecutor's Office. Particular emphasis is placed on the restrictions concerning the disclosure of information by members of the special committee overseeing security agencies, which indicates systemic awareness.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates profound expertise regarding the technical and procedural shortcomings of e-voting. They rely on international expertise, extensively citing the recommendations of the OSCE/ODIHR report concerning cryptography, end-to-end verifiability, and quality assurance. Specific mention is also made of the international analyst Carsten Schürmann, underscoring the technical complexity of the issue.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the legislation of security institutions and the mandates of intelligence agencies, citing specific bill numbers and their legislative history. He/She relies directly on the position of the Head of the Defense Forces Intelligence Center (Colonel Ants Kiviselg) that the law is necessary during a crisis.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of education, focusing on the consequences of the lack of special needs support in small schools. He/She uses specific terminology such as "special support," "composite class," and "educationally developmentally delayed." The expertise emphasizes the lack of resources, particularly the shortage of teachers in small communities.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the procedural rules of the Riigikogu, referencing the role of the Constitutional Committee, the submission of materials, and the options available for taking a recess. They are also familiar with the activities of the Ministry of the Interior and the minister’s public statements, citing Vilja Kiisler’s interview with Interior Minister Läänemets on April 30th. This expertise centers on political accountability and procedural correctness.