By Plenary Sessions: Ants Frosch

The speaker occupies a critical oversight role, posing questions to the Minister of the Interior. This indicates an opposition stance or a position designed to challenge the government's actions. The criticism is aimed at the lack of transparency in the procedure and the ambiguity of the timeframe, making it inherently procedural and policy-based.

The main targets of criticism are the ruling coalition, the Republic Electoral Committee (VVK), and the Electoral Service. The criticism is both procedural and political, stressing their unwillingness to solve the problems and move forward. The speaker warns that inaction will lead to an e-voting fiasco, which constitutes high-intensity confrontation.

The primary opponents are the Government of the Republic and officials from the Ministry of Defence, whose stance is deemed irresponsible and indicative of a failure to grasp the significance of the draft legislation. Criticism is intense and centers on political negligence, as the government is delaying the necessary legal amendment under the pretext of conducting further analysis.

Criticism is directed at the minister and the government for the inadequate implementation of the special support system, which jeopardizes the educational development of Estonian children. The objection is raised at both the policy and execution levels, emphasizing the scarcity of resources (teachers) and the system's inability to guarantee equal education.

The main opposition is aimed at the Riigikogu leadership and majority over the procedural rushing, known colloquially as the "steamroller." The executive branch (Interior Minister Läänemets) faces sharp criticism for incompetence and for requesting "indulgences" from Parliament, which suggests the government is avoiding accountability. The criticism is mainly procedural and concerns the government's activities.