By Plenary Sessions: Ants Frosch

The data shows participation in the plenary session where questions are posed to the Minister of the Interior. Insufficient data regarding frequency or rhythm.

The speaker is addressing the Riigikogu plenary session, focusing on a single critical issue. They are attempting to maximize the public visibility of the topic, expressing hope that the broadcast is being watched by both ordinary citizens and the staff of the National Electoral Commission. Other patterns of activity (e.g., frequency, meetings) are not evident.

These patterns of activity demonstrate persistent and repetitive legislative action when submitting the same bill, indicating a readiness to resubmit it even in the event of failure. The speaker attended a session of the Special Committee for the Supervision of Security Agencies, where they received information from the Chief of the Defence Forces Intelligence Centre.

Not enough data.

The speaker's activity was concentrated on a single day of the plenary session, where he participated intensely in procedural disputes, repeatedly requesting recesses and posing questions to the rapporteurs and committee chairs. He referenced the need to communicate with colleagues and church leaders, which indicates active involvement in behind-the-scenes lobbying.