By Plenary Sessions: Ants Frosch

The speaker is opposed to the current legislative bill, stressing its potential negative impact on regional inequality. This political stance is heavily focused on protecting Estonia's remote and poorer regions, framing the opposition as a critique centered on the policy's consequences.

The political stance is vehemently opposed to the e-voting system and the associated legislative process, viewing the system as hopeless and vulnerable to manipulation. The speaker frames this situation as a crisis of Estonian parliamentarism and a movement toward autocracy, stressing that the Prime Minister’s will always prevails. This position is principled (value-based), centering on electoral integrity and the failure of democratic procedures.

The political focus is heavily directed toward foreign and security policy, underscoring the extreme severity of the international situation. The speaker criticizes the effectiveness of the government's actions, pointing to the failure of Estonia’s security policy initiative (the "million shells" idea). Strategically, there is a demand for clarity regarding Estonia’s positioning within NATO and its policy toward the United States, with an apparent preference for a bipartisan approach.

The political stance is strongly value-driven, highlighting the importance of national symbols (the Estonian flag 140) and criticizing their neglect within the cultural program. Opposition is emerging against the prioritization of LGBT+ themes over national values, which ultimately calls the cultural program's priorities into question.

The speaker strongly demands accountability from state officials and criticizes the trend where high-ranking officials attempt to shirk their duties and resign prematurely. He demands that the Ministry of Justice be granted the right to intervene in the work of the Prosecutor's Office due to lengthy court proceedings, which constitute a punishment in themselves. Furthermore, he strongly criticizes the creation of the unified PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) as a rash decision, considering its reversal a matter of life and death for Estonia.

The political focus is heavily directed toward the security threats arising in Estonia from mass immigration and Ukrainian refugees. The speaker is demanding the imposition of a total moratorium on all other immigration and is asking the government to establish clear red lines for assessing the development of the crisis. This stance is strongly critical and value-based, emphasizing the necessity of preparing for the worst-case scenario.