By Plenary Sessions: Ants Frosch

The legislative focus is currently aimed at opposing a specific, debated piece of legislation, whose effects are deemed detrimental to outlying regions. The speaker is actively campaigning against the draft bill, posing critical questions to the minister.

The main legislative focus is currently the opposition to Draft Bill 344, which amends the Riigikogu Election Act, specifically centering on the reliability of e-elections. The speaker wishes to extend the retention period for anonymous logs (e.g., 10 or 50 years) and investigate the use of facial recognition for authentication. He is a staunch critic of the bill.

Not enough data

The focus is rather on oversight and questioning the government's actions regarding the substantive choices made within state-supported cultural programs (Tartu 2024). Specific draft laws are not mentioned.

The speaker's priority is establishing a legislative basis that would allow the Minister of Justice to intervene in the work of the Prosecutor's Office through administrative supervision. Also under consideration is the possible reversal of the decision to create the unified PPA agency.

The focus is on changing government policy, demanding a moratorium on immigration and the definition of clear quantitative markers (red lines) for assessing security threats. Specific bills or amendments are not mentioned; instead, the emphasis is placed on political pressure.