By Plenary Sessions: Varro Vooglaid

The main confrontation is aimed at the Reform Party-led government and the Prime Minister, who are being accused of incompetence (specifically regarding drone detection) and of falsely accusing political opponents (EKRE). Particularly sharp criticism is directed at Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna, who allegedly overstepped his authority by providing international assurances regarding the deployment of the Defense Forces. The criticism is both procedural and substantive, demanding clear accountability from the government.

The confrontation is aimed at the government's policies (the green transition, finance) and the general political mentality that demands going along with the changes. The Center Party is being criticized for potentially putting on a "show" of their positions, while demands are being made for a clear and binding confirmation regarding the termination of e-elections. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, not personal.

The speaker sharply criticized the governing coalition and its ministers, accusing them of disregarding the constitution and passing unjust legislation. The critique is primarily political and procedural, highlighting the government’s low public approval (12–13%) and its failure to acknowledge mistakes (the car tax). He called upon the coalition members of parliament to defend their arguments at the podium instead of simply shaking their heads.

The main criticism is directed at the Prime Minister, accusing them of violating diplomatic etiquette by publicly criticizing the decisions of the Latvian parliament. The Prime Minister is also criticized for their alleged sloganizing approach to the issue of women's rights and for labeling EKRE. The criticism is procedural and moderately strong.

The confrontation is aimed at the government, which is defending the project, and the chairman of the session (Toomas Kivimägi), who is being directly criticized for spreading misinformation. The criticism is intense, focusing on deficiencies in both policy (internal security) and procedure (the concealment of classified information). Jürgen Ligi is singled out for criticism because he casually mentioned the existence of secret threat assessments during the Legal Affairs Committee meeting.