By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Ernits

The main criticism is directed at the judicial system and a specific judge, whose ruling is considered dangerous and irresponsible. The criticism is intense and substantive, focusing on the judge's decision to disregard the recidivist's previous serious crimes (murder, strangulation).

The primary criticism is directed at Prime Minister Kristen Michal and the Reform Party, who stand accused of driving the country into the mire and suffering historically low levels of credibility. The criticism targets both political failures (maritime affairs, security) and procedural weakness (the Riigikogu acting as a rubber stamp). The relationship between the coalition partners is described using the analogy of a victim and a domestic abuser, highlighting the uncompromising opposition to the government's actions.

The main opponent is the head of government, Kristen Michal, and his party, who are criticized both for their political performance and a lack of personal competence. The attacks are intense and focus on the poor state of the economy and the legitimacy of e-elections. Furthermore, the Prime Minister’s statements regarding the fairness of the Russian elections are also being called into question.

The main opponents are the government coalition (the Reform Party, Eesti 200) and the Riigikogu board (the "troika"). The criticism is both political (the prisoner agreement, the car tax, the budget) and procedural (the humiliating treatment of the Auditor General). The intensity of the attacks is high, accusing the government of committing "blunders" in running the country and losing trust.

The primary objection is aimed at both the presiding officer (for failing to implement procedural intervention) and the Prime Minister, who is accused of avoiding a specific question and addressing an irrelevant topic (alien species). The criticism is intense and concerns both the violation of the rules of procedure and the ignoring of substantive issues.

The primary opposition is aimed squarely at the government and specific ministers (the Minister of Justice and Finance Minister Ligi). They face criticism regarding the inefficiency of the judicial system and the opacity of the legislative process. The criticism leveled against them is sharp and performance-driven, particularly concerning crime control and the alleged concealment of the KAPO report.

The backlash is intense and aimed squarely at the governing coalition, particularly the Reform Party and Eesti 200, who are accused of procedurally killing and quietly "suffocating" bills (for instance, the birthday allowance bill). Criticism targets both political priorities (defense spending) and the organization of the Riigikogu’s work, which is viewed as a ritual designed solely to avoid providing answers.