By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Ernits

The political focus is directed at issues concerning the legal system and the accountability of judges, especially regarding the early release of dangerous recidivists and the resulting consequences. The speaker sharply criticizes a specific judge's decision that led to a tragic event, emphasizing the need for stricter judicial practice. The criticism is strongly outcome-based, centering on the failure to ensure public safety.

The speaker is in strong opposition to Kristen Michal's government, criticizing its credibility and referring to the country's descent into the "bottom tier." The political focus is directed at the government's priorities, contrasting the development of a maritime nation with the reputation of a prison and casino state. Emphasis is placed on the necessity for the Riigikogu (Parliament), as the government's employer, to seize power, so as not to become a "pathetic rubber stamp."

The political stance is fiercely anti-government, focusing specifically on the poor performance of Prime Minister Kristen Michal. The main points of emphasis are economic instability (inflation, youth unemployment) and the decline of the state's credibility. Deep skepticism is also expressed regarding e-voting, linking it to Russia and Venezuela, alongside a demand that the current government be stripped of its authority to govern the country.

The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the government's ("regime's") crisis of confidence and incompetence. The sharpest opposition is directed at the ratification of the Swedish prisoner agreement, and the government's priorities are criticized, specifically that money is being spent on expensive foreign prisoners while social benefits (such as disability allowance) are laughably small. The framing is strongly value-based and results-oriented, emphasizing alienation and the "stupid decisions" being made in the country.

The political position heavily emphasizes the procedural correctness and accountability of the Riigikogu (Parliament). The speaker demands intervention when the Prime Minister avoids answering specific questions, particularly regarding the situation of low-wage earners (people making 1000 euros). The stance is strongly results-oriented, criticizing the inaction of both the executive branch (the Prime Minister) and the chair of the session.

The speaker zeroes in sharply on the failures of the justice system concerning repeat violent offenses, demanding accountability and an explanation as to why the perpetrator was free, which points to strong performance-based criticism. A second key theme is the economic utilization of state assets (prisons) to generate revenue, stressing fiscal efficiency and maximizing revenues.

The political position is strongly socio-centric and national, urgently stressing the need to increase the pension supplement (by 75–100 euros) and resolve Estonia's existential demographic crisis. It sharply opposes government expenditures, particularly the "drowning of forests" and excessive arms acquisitions, prioritizing the vitality of the nation and the preservation of its culture. The political framework is overwhelmingly value-based, focusing on the objectives set forth in the preamble of the constitution.