By Plenary Sessions: Peeter Ernits

The focus is on two main regulatory topics: the scope of implementation of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the economic impact and long-term timeline of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) requirements. The speaker is rather anti-regulation or a proponent of their relaxation, emphasizing the economic damage.

The legislative focus is on monitoring the transposition and implementation of European Union directives, particularly within the financial sector. The speaker's role is to request clarifications regarding the scope of the regulations and any delays in implementation, thereby acting as an implementation overseer.

The legislative focus is directed towards working within the Committee on Rural Affairs and providing oversight of government activity through questions posed during plenary sessions. The speaker's priority is elevating the importance of the rural sector in the eyes of the government.

The speaker primarily acts as an opponent, voting against the church law and criticizing the gender balance directive. They consider economic stimulation and infrastructure financing to be priorities, rather than the transposition of minor international conventions (such as penalizing smoking on aircraft).

The legislative focus centers on legislation pertaining to the judicial system, stressing the need for fair consideration of institutional feedback and a systemic approach. The speaker is critical of the bureaucratic character of the proposed laws and advocates for the use of AI to ensure the coherence and compatibility between different pieces of legislation.

Insufficient data.

The legislative focus centers on supporting a specific draft bill, even though the speaker admits they are not familiar with its prior proceedings. The effectiveness and relevance of the legislative debate is also a key issue.

The primary legislative focus is the amendment of the Hunting Act, and the speaker supports moving forward with the opposition’s draft bill. However, he strongly criticizes fixing laws "in small pieces" (or piecemeal) and demands that if action is going to be taken, multiple changes should be implemented simultaneously to save time and money.

The legislative focus centers on the failure to adopt a specific EU directive and the criticism surrounding the related legislative inaction. The speaker stresses the necessity of immediate action to prevent the further accumulation of fines.