By Months: Peeter Ernits

The speaker is strongly oppositional, criticizing the government’s steamroller tactics regarding the constitution and public opinion, citing the resistance of 77,442 people. The main issues are controversial legislative bills that require mitigation (specifically concerning children and people with disabilities), and foreign agreements (the Tidö Deal). The position is value-based and intensely confrontational, highlighting the government’s incompetence and the waste of resources.

The speaker is fiercely oppositional, blasting the government—and especially Prime Minister Michal—for incompetence, arrogance, and the country's stagnation (drawing comparisons to Leonid Brezhnev). Their political stance centers on staunch opposition to uncontrolled immigration, the slashing of regional services, and the sheer "mess" surrounding the Ministry of Defense's spending. The speaker stresses that the government is a "rotting, decayed tree" and operates in a slack and lazy manner, completely ignoring constitutional principles.

The speaker adopts a fiercely oppositional stance, criticizing the government's actions as arrogant, incompetent, and actively contributing to the impoverishment of the populace. Their political focus centers on protecting citizens' fundamental rights (specifically, opposing the RAB super-database) and demanding state financial accountability (citing EU fines and the unfair distribution of subsidies). The government's low approval rating (estimated at 20 seats in the Riigikogu) is a repeated argument used to challenge its legitimacy and condemn its heavy-handed "steamroller" approach to policy.

The political position is strongly critical of the government and the ruling elite, focusing on government incompetence, wasteful spending (EU fines), and a lack of priorities (substitute activities). The criticism is primarily aimed at the government's actions and effectiveness (a performance-driven approach), emphasizing the necessity of saving state funds and reducing bureaucracy. Double standards in foreign policy and economic relations with Russia are also criticized.

The speaker positions themselves as a fierce critic of the government (specifically the administrations led by Kaja Kallas and Kristen Michal), accusing them of draining the populace and acting like an enemy. Key themes include the catastrophic condition of the Estonian economy, unjust laws (such as the car tax), and irresponsible energy policy (subsidies). The political framework is heavily focused on values and results, stressing public welfare and the quality of lawmaking.