By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Valge

The rhetorical style is combative, urgent, and strongly critical, directly addressing the audience with, "Dear colleagues! Estonian men and Estonian women!" The argumentation is data-driven, using statistics to illustrate the record highs of the economic downturn and migration balance. Ironic comparisons are used (e.g., a minister repeating himself on Vikerraadio at the speed of a DJ, a trombone in a trash band) to discredit the opponent and emphasize the futility of their arguments.

The style is critical and direct, although the minister is addressed politely at the beginning. The speaker relies heavily on logical arguments and data to prove the failure of the education system. Strong language is used to emphasize the gravity of the situation, claiming that the system is "very messed up" and that reforms have been "totally missed."

The style is formal and analytical, incorporating criticism regarding the level of the debate (specifically calling it primitive). The speaker employs rhetorical questions and refers to international practice, emphasizing logical and procedural argumentation while attempting to achieve consensus on the quality of the debate itself.

The rhetorical style is formal, logical, and data-driven, focusing on presenting facts and highlighting their negative trend. A medical metaphor ("diagnosis," "treatment") is employed to underscore the gravity of the situation, thereby creating the impression that a crisis is at hand. The tone is critical and demands statesmanlike accountability from the minister.