By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Valge

The opposition is aimed directly at the minister and the ruling coalition, who are being criticized for taking controversial steps that harm the state. The criticism is policy-driven, particularly concerning the stalling of efforts to revoke voting rights, which increases the risk posed by anti-Estonian candidates.

The criticism is aimed at the economic policy dogma of the government/Reform Party, ironically referencing the actions of Margaret Thatcher—who is considered the Reform Party's role model, yet who actually implemented a bank tax. The confrontation is policy-based, focusing on the poorer state of the Estonian economy compared to Lithuania, which did implement a bank tax.

The primary opponent is the government, particularly the Minister of the Interior, who is criticized both for disregarding historical memory (the confiscation of the Lihula monument) and for immigration policy (the sheltering of Ukrainian men). The criticism is intense, accusing the minister of incompetence and failing to recognize the continuity of the Republic of Estonia, while his responses are dismissed as unconvincing legalistic explanations.