By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Valge

The rhetorical style is direct, critical, and demanding, challenging the minister regarding the counterproductivity of his actions. A question format is employed, which inherently contains a strong accusation, and an immediate and clear political declaration is demanded to defuse the tension. The appeal is primarily logical and strategic, focusing on the avoidance of political consequences.

The rhetorical style is formal and courteous, starting with an acknowledgement of the presenter and expressing a desire for a substantive discussion. The argumentation is logical and relies on historical and regional comparisons. The tone is intellectually inquisitive and critical, aimed at challenging the opposing side's viewpoints.

The style is formal, critical, and polemical, drawing heavily upon historical facts, legal definitions, and statistical data. The tone is accusatory and insistent, particularly regarding the Minister of the Interior's responses, which are repeatedly judged to be inadequate and unconvincing. The speaker frequently employs rhetorical questions and analogies (such as the one involving the Bronze Soldier) to underscore their viewpoints.