By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Valge

The main criticism is aimed at the Social Democrats, who are accused of political hypocrisy and of failing to address the issue previously while they were in the previous government. Criticism is also directed at their political choice regarding why they agree to strip Russian citizens of their voting rights, but not those with undetermined citizenship. The attacks concern both procedural matters and political consistency.

The main opposition is directed at the actions of recent governments regarding the importation of cheap labor and the resulting lack of systemic control. Specifically, the speaker is criticized as an "advocate for mass immigration," and the minister is directly asked for the definition of the terminology (democracy) he uses. Furthermore, Eesti 200 is indirectly accused of irresponsibility in matters of national policy.

The criticism is aimed primarily at the actions of the Ministry of Education and Research and the government, accusing them of undermining the status of the Estonian language (via Russian-language websites) and failing to oversee the implementation of administrative agreements (a Potemkin village scenario). The critic also takes issue with the minister’s arguments, labeling them demagogic and logically flawed, and stands against the promotion of mass immigration.