By Plenary Sessions: Jaak Valge

The rhetorical style is confrontational and challenging, aimed directly at the opposition (the Social Democrats), calling their political consistency into question. Rhetorical questions are employed, and the presenter is required to confirm the experts’ viewpoints, which lends the speech an evidence-based, yet sharp, tone. The speaker uses the accusation of "looking in the mirror" to attack the opposition’s previous inaction.

The rhetorical style is critical, analytical, and evidence-based, utilizing strong logical connections (e.g., cheap labor hinders innovation). The speaker addresses the listeners directly ("Estonian men, Estonian women!") and poses sharp, challenging questions to the opposing side, including asking the minister about the definition of democracy.

The speaker employs an academic, evidence-based, yet sharply critical rhetorical style, utilizing both logical arguments and emotional appeals (the address "Estonian men, Estonian women," and the citation of Anna Haava's poem). They accuse the minister of demagoguery and logical fallacies, generally maintaining a formal tone while expressing concern over the fate of the language. They emphasize the potential of artificial intelligence development in boosting the competitiveness of Estonian scientific language.