By Plenary Sessions: Toomas Uibo

The criticism targets the state system and bureaucracy that has kept the air ambulance market closed and monopolized (via PPA helicopters). The objection is rooted in policy and procedure, citing inefficiency, a lack of development, and the state's prioritization of its own "convenience" over saving human lives. Furthermore, the alleged manipulation of the Health Board's budget, which obscures the actual cost of the service, is also under fire.

Opponents are neither criticized nor mentioned; the criticism is instead directed at the limited impact of the action (or statement).

The criticism is broadly aimed at the results of state governance achieved by previous governments and all parties represented in the Riigikogu over the past few decades. Specific criticism is leveled against the overly zealous adoption of European Union directives and decisions that proved misguided. The criticism is policy-driven, and Eesti 200 distances itself from past errors, given that it has not participated in previous governments.

Specific political opponents are not named, but criticism is directed at those who prioritize short-sighted popularity and "easy political wins" over taking responsibility for the country's future. Aggressive Russia is cited as the external threat, which puts pressure on the budgets of European countries and necessitates fiscal strengthening.

The opposition is directed at European Union member states or opposition groups that favor the idea of a Ukrainian buffer zone, which is considered a threat to European unity. The Hungarian Prime Minister is highlighted as a specific representative of this opposing stance. The criticism is policy- and values-based.

The main opponent is the accuser who brought up the names of Eesti 200 and Lehtme on the floor of the Riigikogu. The criticism targets the opposing side's inaction and procedural irregularity, given that the alleged evidence is being withheld and not presented to the police. The intensity of the attack is high, including a direct warning that concealing the evidence could result in criminal charges.