By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The style is highly combative, accusatory, and urgent, expressing moral outrage ("I am ashamed of this government"). Strong historical parallels are employed (Bolsheviks, Lenin, the War of Independence) alongside a personal appeal (the blood of grandfathers). Emotional condemnation is added to the logical arguments (statistics, lack of evidence), labeling the opponents' actions as unlawful and divisive to society.

The rhetorical style is highly combative, accusatory, and blunt, repeatedly employing the term "lying" to characterize the government's actions. The speaker uses powerful emotional language ("green socialism," "insane plan") while simultaneously stressing the economic logic concerning the fallout from expensive electricity. The overall tone is urgent, demanding an immediate reversal of political decisions.

The rhetorical style is sharp, accusatory, and question-driven, employing sarcasm ("iron logic") and powerful analogies. The speaker presents their views directly, demanding a clear answer from the minister regarding the fundamental principles of the economy. An emotional appeal is utilized, comparing Estonia’s current situation to that of underdeveloped African nations where business is dependent on politicians.

The rhetorical style is critical and accusatory, utilizing shocking and detailed examples (pornographic filming techniques, families practicing group sex) to highlight the misuse of state funding. The appeal targets both emotions (the sadness felt as a taxpayer) and a value-based framing of the issue regarding democracy and the independence of the press.

The rhetorical style is formal, direct, and analytical, often employing direct quotations and references (e.g., the minister's previous statements) to substantiate its questions. The tone is challenging and critical, demanding explanations from the minister regarding strategic contradictions and diplomatic démarches.

The style is formal and relies heavily on questions, employing critical and pointed inquiries regarding the government's motives and decisions. The speaker makes logical appeals, citing previous bankruptcies, and maintains a skeptical and investigative tone.