By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The most striking positions are the strong opposition to revoking voting rights from non-citizens and the declaration of the Orthodox Church as a security threat. These positions are value-based, emphasizing that collective punishment violates the principles of democracy and the constitution. The government's policy is also criticized, being labeled "insane green policy" and serving purely political interests. The political stance is strongly oppositional.

The political position heavily centers on the availability of cheap electricity, which is framed as the key to halting the economic recession. The speaker forcefully rejects the government's green agenda and high CO2 taxes, demanding the continuous operation of oil shale power plants and the abandonment of "green socialism." This stance is strongly results-oriented, emphasizing that current policies have driven the Estonian economy into a three-year downturn.

The political position centers on defending the principles of the market economy, standing in strong opposition to state intervention and subsidies that distort competition. The speaker calls into question the government's economic direction, asking pointedly whether Estonia has constructed socialism and a planned economy. The stance is highly critical of the government's energy policy and alleged corruption.

The political focus is currently directed at state-funded Russian-language media, whose content and lack of independence are drawing strong opposition. The speaker questions whether the state should be supporting media that promotes sexually explicit topics and lacks impartiality, emphasizing instead a value-based framework critical of government actions.

The political focus is heavily directed toward foreign policy and security, calling into question the role of the US as the primary ally and security guarantor. The speaker criticizes the government's uncertain strategy, citing contradictory statements regarding both the US alliance and Europe's independent role. The stance is critical and policy-driven, demanding clarity on the current trajectory of the nation's foreign policy.

The political focus is currently on the repeated failures of the national airlines and a critical assessment of government decisions. The speaker questions the long-term subsidizing of the loss-making enterprise, suggesting potential corruption and conflicts of interest. The overall stance is strongly critical of the government's mismanagement and ineffective political action.