By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The political position is fiercely oppositional, criticizing the government’s actions against the backdrop of declining living standards, tax hikes, and a lack of positive outlook. The speaker vehemently opposes draft legislation concerning the social sphere (state fees, unemployment insurance, psychological assistance) as well as the removal of voting rights from Russian citizens. The focus remains on the negative impact of the government’s policies on citizens, particularly pensioners and the less affluent, which points strongly to performance-based criticism. Regarding the voting rights issue, emphasis is placed on the violation of the principles of democracy and the rule of law through collective punishment.

The political position is strongly opposed to the government's taxation of pensions, stressing that a pension constitutes a state debt that must be repaid. Furthermore, the speaker expresses concern regarding the sustainability of Estonia's and the European Union's green agenda, particularly in light of shifts in US policy. The focus is placed on economic consequences and the criticism of government decisions, indicating a policy- and results-based framework.

The most important position is strong opposition to the car tax, which is considered unfair and detrimental to economic growth. The political framework focuses on social justice and economic harm, arguing that the tax burden is already too high as it is. As an alternative, solutions proposed by the Centre Party are offered, such as a solidarity bank tax and the taxation of global corporations' profits.

The political position centers on the fairness of parliamentary procedures and the organization of its work. The speaker expresses strong opposition to perceived personal favoritism or the deliberate ignoring of questions when compiling the queue for the Q&A session. The underlying framework is heavily results-oriented and fundamentally concerns issues of personal access.

The most crucial topics are the protection of national interests and energy policy. The speaker strongly opposes the phasing out of oil shale energy in the name of the green agenda, viewing it as merely the diligent execution of Brussels' mandates. This stance heavily emphasizes national interests and criticizes the government's actions, being primarily value-driven and policy-focused.