By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The primary opponent is the government and the minister. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, focusing on tax hikes (VAT, excise duties, state fees) and the refusal to implement a special tax on banks. The government is accused of yet another attempt to take money from the most vulnerable segments of the population and of increasing the impoverishment of the people.

The opposition is directed at the rapporteur and, indirectly, at the commission, which has failed to provide a satisfactory answer to the fundamental questions concerning the security of e-elections. The criticism is procedural and substantive, focusing on the absence of verification mechanisms.

The main opponents are the government (the Reform Party and Isamaa), the Minister of Foreign Affairs, and the Mayor of Tallinn, Jevgeni Ossinovski. The criticism is intense, personal, and security-focused, centering on the ethical conflict and the support of Russia via tax payments. No willingness to compromise is evident.

The main opponent is the Prime Minister and the government, whose economic policy is deemed fundamentally wrong and dangerous. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on raising taxes and cutting expenditures, and comparing it to negative historical examples. The intensity of the attack is high, utilizing the term "suicide policy."

The primary opposition is aimed at the government and the prime minister, who are sharply criticized for their policy on taxing pensions and for breaking election promises. The criticism is intense, rooted in both policy and values, and involves direct accusations of injustice.

The opposition is aimed at the speaker's positions, demanding an explanation as to why the motor vehicle tax is considered good, but the banks' excess profit tax is bad. The criticism is policy-based and focuses on the logic behind tax priorities and the lack of alternatives.