By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin
Total Sessions: 6
Fully Profiled: 6
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The rhetorical style is sharply confrontational, accusatory, and emotional, employing direct questions aimed at the minister, such as, "Aren't you ashamed?" Logical arguments concerning statistics on inequality and poverty are interwoven with strong language, accusing the government of robbing its citizens. The overall tone is urgent and critical.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The style is formal and direct, addressing the session chair and the rapporteur respectfully. The speaker is insistent, emphasizing the necessity of now receiving a specific, logic-based explanation for the question that had previously gone unanswered.
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, information briefing
The speaking style is highly confrontational, accusatory, and demanding. Repeated questions are employed, and there is a demand for ministers to be called to order, while simultaneously stressing that the speaker is telling "the truth." The emphasis rests on an emotional and morally-based appeal, accusing opponents of malicious activity.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The rhetorical style is sharply aggressive and critical, employing strong, emotionally charged phrases like "suicide policy." Rhetorical questions are used to challenge the logic and outcomes of the prime minister's policies. The tone suggests skepticism and the sense that they are living "in a completely different Estonia" than the government.
2024-04-03
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, information briefing
The rhetorical style is confrontational and emotional, particularly in the first speech, where a personal story (a begging elderly woman) and the exclamation "Shame!" are employed. Direct questions are used to challenge the fairness and legitimacy of the government's policy, effectively balancing the emotional appeal with political facts.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The style is formal and interrogative, utilizing the addresses "esteemed Presiding Officer" and "esteemed Presenter." The speaker focuses on logical appeal, posing direct questions regarding tax policy alternatives and contradictions. The tone is direct and demanding, seeking clarification.