By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The primary confrontation targets the government’s tax policy, which critics argue is slowing down economic growth and creating social injustice (due to the lack of exemptions). The criticism is intense and centers on specific political decisions, casting doubt on the government’s grasp of the resulting economic consequences.

The opposition is aimed at the government's political approach, which automatically links children's health to the introduction of new taxes (the sugar tax). The criticism is purely policy-based, questioning the viability of the proposed solution and offering better alternatives.

The main opponent is the Prime Minister and the government, who are being criticized for the prolonged duration of the economic recession and for their inaction. The criticism is severe and focuses on the government's inefficiency in restoring economic growth. The opposition's stance demands direct accountability and the presentation of concrete results.

The main opponents are Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the Reform Party, who are accused of promising tax hikes and spreading misinformation. Isamaa is also criticized in connection with the privatization of Estonian Railways. The criticism is intense, focusing on both political decisions and personal accusations (lying, concealing the spouse's business dealings).

The main adversary is the Prime Minister and the government, whose tax policy is being criticized intensely and fundamentally. The criticism focuses on the unfairness of the policy, accusing the government of taxing the poor instead of the rich.