By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The rhetorical style is direct, critical, and demanding, posing sharp questions to the minister. Logical appeals are employed, referencing the factual decline of the economy and constitutional principles to underscore the illogical nature of the government's policy. The tone is formal and focuses on facts and consequences.

The language used is formal and respectful, addressing the chair of the session and the minister directly. The style is interrogative and policy-focused, employing a rhetorical question ("But why...?") to challenge the opposing side's stance. The appeal is logical, centering on political alternatives rather than emotions.

The style is formal and direct, utilizing polite forms of address ("Esteemed Chairman of the Session! Esteemed Prime Minister!"). The tone is accusatory and demanding, emphasizing the government's prolonged inaction during the economic crisis. The speaker demands a logical and verifiable response, requesting the naming of the specific company that received aid.

The rhetorical style is highly aggressive, accusatory, and confrontational, employing direct personal accusations against the Prime Minister ("why do you lie all the time"). Strong emotional language is utilized ("detrimental fraud"), and the speaker relies on rhetorical questions to challenge the opponent's morality and competence.

The rhetorical style is formal, respectfully addressing the session chairman and the prime minister, yet its content is sharply critical and confrontational. The speaker uses a rhetorical question to cast doubt on the fairness of the government's tax policy, combining fact-based critique with an appeal to social justice.