By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The primary criticism is leveled against the government and ministries (especially PRIA), criticizing their fiscal decisions and poor performance in funding healthcare and education. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, accusing the government of setting the wrong priorities. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, they are demanding that funds be reallocated.

The main opponent is the government and the prime minister, who are being asked direct questions. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the financial imprudence of the government's economic decisions (tax hikes) and the major project (Rail Baltic).

The primary targets of criticism are the Prime Minister and the Minister of Regional Affairs, whose claims regarding a good life and the stabilization of prices are deemed inaccurate. Criticism is also aimed at the inaction of the Competition Authority, suggesting a regulatory failure.

The primary confrontation is between the government and a specific minister, who is being criticized for the policy regarding the funding of private media. The criticism is intense and ethical, focusing on the suspicion of an attempt to influence the media, which suggests a profound lack of confidence in the government's motives.