By Plenary Sessions: Aleksandr Tšaplõgin

The style is critical and urgent, employing rhetorical questions to cast doubt on the government’s priorities ("Is everything really going so well in our country?"). The speaker balances emotional appeals (patients dying while on waiting lists, the difficult situation of the elderly) with specific financial indicators. The tone is formal, addressing the prime minister directly, but the content is clearly confrontational.

The style is formal, respectfully addressing the session chairman and the prime minister, yet simultaneously sharply critical and interrogative. The speaker employs direct questions to challenge the government's grasp of the economic consequences and the necessity of the Rail Baltic project. The tone is challenging and grounded in logical arguments (unprofitability).

The rhetorical style is direct and critical, utilizing specific numerical data (heating bills) to refute the government's general claims. The speaker emphasizes the seriousness of the issue with a rhetorical question ("Do you think this is normal?"), which lends a sharp and insistent tone to the address.

The rhetorical style is direct, provocative, and skeptical, utilizing repeated rhetorical questions to convey distrust. The tone is demanding and critical, emphasizing that the minister's response is insufficient ("your words fall short").