By Months: Vilja Toomast

No data available

From an economic standpoint, the speaker supports increasing the fine rates, arguing that this will boost state budget revenues, though he stresses that this is not the primary objective of the proposed legislation. He points out that the government's decision to raise the fine unit was a complex one, but it was relatively modest compared to the increase in the minimum wage. The speaker remains wary of tying fines directly to income, citing concerns about potential income concealment.

Economic perspectives advocate for fiscal responsibility, arguing that offenders should cover the procedural costs themselves rather than burdening the taxpayer. He justifies raising the unit fine, pointing to its proportionality with the growth in the average wage, although he acknowledges that projections for fine collection are volatile.

There is insufficient information. It is only mentioned that long-term solitary confinement has resulted in compensation claims against the state, which points to the need to avoid legal violations that incur costs for the state.

Insufficient data