By Plenary Sessions: Madis Timpson
Total Sessions: 4
Fully Profiled: 4
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
There is no direct opposition; the speaker focuses instead on raising technical questions and recalling previous procedural concerns (the fear of defending the budget). The criticism is directed more towards unresolved procedural issues, rather than specific political opponents.
2025-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The criticism is aimed at the quality and procedures of the government’s legislative work, particularly concerning the increased administrative burden on businesses and the lack of constitutional compliance analysis. The opposition is procedural and concerning, but not personal, focusing instead on the system’s shortcomings.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at shortcomings in the implementation of the policy, demanding a concrete plan and timeline from the government. The speaker is performing an oversight function by posing a question to the minister, but maintains a respectful tone while doing so. There is no direct personal or procedural criticism involved.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is no direct opposition, as the speaker notes that they "don't directly have anything against this bill." However, they do present procedural and substantive criticism, emphasizing that the bill requires amendments to the General Part of the Penal Code (KarS) and warns of the risk of the proceedings dragging on and the law becoming obsolete.