By Years: Urve Tiidus

There is no direct political confrontation; instead, criticism is aimed more at the substantive quality of the draft legislation and the practical necessity of the regulations. Questions are raised regarding the ambition of the objectives (for example, why reduce the misuse of residence permits to a "minimum" rather than "zero") and the complexity of the legislative process.

The criticism targets the speed and quality of the government’s work, particularly regarding the development of the framework—promised in the coalition agreement—for suspending the voting rights of Russian Federation and Belarusian citizens, noting a perceived reluctance to address the issue. Furthermore, it criticizes the excessive haste in legislative drafting and the subpar level of constitutional analysis applied to the draft bills.