By Months: Urve Tiidus

Total Months: 10

Fully Profiled: 10

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
12.2024

10 Speeches

There are no direct attacks or criticism aimed at specific opponents or political groups. Instead, the criticism is directed toward vague regulations and systemic shortcomings, demanding clarification of accountability and risk mitigation.
Details View Details
11.2024

6 Speeches

There are no direct attacks or criticism aimed at opponents or specific political groups. The questions are focused instead on clarifying and verifying the financial or administrative impact of the draft legislation.
Details View Details
10.2024

6 Speeches

The opposition's stance is articulated in a direct question posed to the Centre Party, demanding an explanation as to why a similar law was not proposed while they were in government. This criticism targets political accountability and consistency, remaining focused on actions rather than becoming personal. Furthermore, regarding individuals who have been penalized, he/she stresses that they "must not work," referring to strict limitations.
Details View Details
09.2024

5 Speeches

The speaker does not directly criticize or attack any political opponent, but rather poses questions to the ministers and the Chancellor of Justice in order to obtain information and clarifications. Insufficient information.
Details View Details
06.2024

5 Speeches

Direct opposition to political opponents is not evident in the speeches. Criticism is aimed primarily at imperfect legal provisions and procedural bottlenecks, such as the overly specific list of exceptions in the Nature Conservation Act, which prevents reasonable solutions from being found.
Details View Details
05.2024

9 Speeches

There is no direct confrontation with specific political groups or individuals. The criticism is aimed instead at the shortcomings of political solutions and the inefficiency of their implementation, such as whether the sugar tax ensures that sugar substitutes do not gain an advantage.
Details View Details
04.2024

3 Speeches

There are no direct attacks or criticism aimed at political opponents or groups. The criticism is instead directed at the substantive shortcomings and lack of clarity in the presentation, for example, the omission of the topic of water consumption from the report.
Details View Details
03.2024

10 Speeches

There is no direct confrontation, however, the speaker is critically monitoring the government’s inaction or delays in establishing the legal framework promised in the coalition agreement for suspending the voting rights of Russian and Belarusian citizens. They reference a comment made by an EKRE representative, suggesting the government is unwilling to address this urgent issue, yet the speaker personally confirms that the matter is, in fact, being handled.
Details View Details
02.2024

4 Speeches

There is no direct confrontation with political opponents. The criticism is instead directed at the stark contrast between international reality and the rules-based order.
Details View Details
01.2024

10 Speeches

There is no direct confrontation or personal criticism. The criticism is aimed at systemic or procedural deficiencies, such as the modest scope of the constitutional analysis in the explanatory notes, regarding which the politician agrees with the expert opinion that "it is time to take the constitution seriously." The politician also notes that previous major fears concerning the risks of the ESM have not materialized.
Details View Details
Back to Profiling