By Plenary Sessions: Urve Tiidus
Total Sessions: 7
Fully Profiled: 7
2024-05-30
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The opposition is aimed at the government's potential fiscal policy decisions, particularly the increase in national debt. The criticism is policy-based, challenging the logic that infrastructure problems justify taking on greater debt during economic hardship. The intensity of the attack is moderate, presented in the form of a question.
2024-05-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
The opposition is aimed primarily at political inertia and the failure to solve the engineer shortage problem over the last 15 years. The criticism is policy-driven, not personal, and underscores the need for solutions that differ from those previously implemented.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
This is not criticism; rather, it is a clarifying question addressed to the minister regarding the preparation of the draft bill, intended to ensure that the proposals are taken into account.
2024-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is no direct criticism or confrontation aimed at other political forces. The focus is on obtaining explanations and assurances from the government representative regarding the content and implementation of the bill.
2024-05-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is directed at those who question the integrity and reliability of e-voting. The criticism is systemic, protecting voters from unfair suspicions regarding the validity of their method of casting a ballot.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The standoff is directed at the government representative (the minister) and is purely policy- or procedural-centric. The criticism is based on the idea that the proposed tax may grant sugar substitutes an unintended advantage, thereby undermining the goal of health promotion.